Crossbench briefed on proposed gambling ad reform (21 Aug 2024)
PK: Well, the federal government hasn't revealed much detail about its plans to tackle gambling advertising. You heard earlier from Katie Gallagher that they're still consulting. However, there was a crossbench briefing earlier this week. Kate Chaney, the independent member for Curtin, was there and joins us now. Welcome.
KC: Hi, Patricia.
PK: What's the current position on this issue?
KC: Apparently, no final decisions have been made, which gives the government an opportunity to do the right thing and implement a total ban on gambling ads, which is what communities want.
PK: How did Labor explain its position to you? Was there anything in the briefing that suggested they're considering a change?
KC: It was framed as addressing public health issues. But if you look at the evidence, a ban is the obvious solution. Clearly, another factor they're weighing is the sustainability of broadcast media. I'm open to discussing how we ensure sustainable and diverse media, but let's not conflate that with public health. We shouldn't normalise gambling for kids in exchange for regional TV stations. These issues should be dealt with separately.
PK: What should be done for free-to-air television in your view?
KC: I don't have all the answers, but gambling revenue isn't the only option. We banned tobacco ads, and though there was concern, the sky didn’t fall. The world has changed, so let's consider other models, like a levy, but have that discussion publicly. I'm concerned that a public health issue is being compromised without proper public debate.
PK: The inquiry into online gambling ads made 31 recommendations. Do you know more about the others?
KC: No. So far, we're only discussing recommendation 26, which relates to advertising. There's much more in that report, like the need for a single responsible minister and better regulation. It’s been 14 months since the report was finalised, and the government needs to respond broadly before the next election.
PK: The Guardian reports that Teal MPs are worried about behaviour in question time, claiming the opposition's performances are condescending, aggressive, and often misogynistic. Do you agree?
KC: Yes, the behaviour in question time is shocking. It wouldn't be tolerated elsewhere. Long-time MPs might see it as normal, but it’s the worst part of parliament. The noise from the coalition when crossbenchers ask questions is appalling.
PK: Misogynistic, though?
KC: I have trouble distinguishing between misogyny and poor behaviour.
PK: OK, we'll leave it there. Independent MP Kate Chaney, thank you.
