Networks seek legal advice as gambling signs evade ad ban (11 Aug 2024)
Article summary: As the federal government considers changes to online gambling advertising regulations, major broadcasters and sporting codes are pushing back against proposals that stop short of a complete ban. The lobby group Free TV, representing Nine Entertainment, Seven West Media, and Network Ten, has sought legal advice arguing that the federal government does have the power to ban wagering logos on sporting team jerseys and stadium signs, contrary to the government's claims that only states hold this power.
The proposed changes, which have sparked controversy, include a ban on gambling ads on television one hour before and after live sports, a limit of two ads per hour until 10pm, and a total ban on social media and digital advertising. These measures would take effect in 2026, falling short of the full ban recommended by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy.
Independent MP Kate Chaney has criticised the government's approach, describing any further inquiry into the matter as "kicking the can down the road." She emphasised that partial bans are ineffective, merely shifting the advertisements around rather than eliminating them. Chaney advocates for a clear phase-out plan for all online gambling ads to prevent the industry from exploiting loopholes, such as content creation and stadium promotions.
Chaney's stance is echoed by other independent MPs, including Zoe Daniel and ACT Senator David Pocock, who argue that Australians overwhelmingly support a complete ban on all forms of gambling advertising, including logos on jerseys and stadium signage. They urge the government to show courage and implement the comprehensive reforms that the public demands, rather than succumbing to pressure from broadcasters and the gambling industry. Chaney's position underscores the need for decisive action to address the pervasive influence of gambling advertising in Australian sports and media.
Related article: The Big Gamble (10 Aug 2024)
