The Big Gamble (10 Aug 2024)
Article summary: The government's slow progress on gambling reforms has been heavily criticised, with claims that the influence of television networks and media proprietors outweighs that of the betting industry itself. Independent MP Kate Chaney has been particularly vocal, highlighting the stark contrast between public sentiment and the government's actions.
Last year, Chaney pointed out that a parliamentary committee recommended a total ban on online gambling advertising. Despite this, gambling companies made substantial political donations, totalling around $600,000. Chaney questioned whether the government would prioritise community concerns or succumb to the interests of its donors. In response, Minister Michelle Rowland acknowledged the issue of excessive gambling advertising but insisted that the matter was complex, requiring ongoing consultations with key stakeholders.
Chaney has consistently raised concerns over the government's inaction, noting that 14 months have passed since the report titled "You win some, you lose more" was tabled. The report, endorsed by all committee members including Chaney, called for a comprehensive ban on online gambling ads over three years. However, recent leaks suggest the government will propose a limited ban, focusing on social media and digital platforms, while allowing gambling ads to continue on broadcast media.
The crossbench, including Chaney, has expressed frustration with the government's approach, suggesting that the major parties are influenced by donations from the gambling industry. The leaked details of the government's proposal have reinforced Chaney's concerns that media interests, rather than public health, are driving policy decisions.
Chaney's stance underscores a broader critique of the government's reluctance to implement the full recommendations of the Murphy report, particularly in light of overwhelming public support for a ban on gambling ads. As the government prepares to respond to these recommendations, Chaney and other crossbenchers remain vigilant, advocating for reforms that genuinely reflect the will of the people rather than the interests of powerful media and gambling entities.
